What's more, the study authors argue, the genetic evidence itself is flawed. Get a genetics overview. What's more, the genetic similarities likely include many ancient DNA traits that are shared across a much broader group of animals. By contrast, humans share at least 28 unique physical characteristics with orangutans but only 2 with chimps and 7 with gorillas, the authors say.
The finding, which has the potential to spark a radical rethink of human origins, is being met with caution. Even though he still backs the human-chimp relationship, Andrews had recommended that the study be published, and it now appears in the June issue of the Journal of Biogeography. With the sequencing of the chimpanzee genome in , scientists found direct proof that humans and chimps are 96 percent the same genetically.
But looking at physical traits rather than genetic ones, orangutans are a better match, Grehan and Schwartz say. Tell-tale features shared by both orangutans and humans include thickly enameled molar teeth with flat surfaces, greater asymmetries between the left and right side of the brain, an increased cartilage-to-bone ratio in the forearm, and similarly shaped shoulder blades. The team also highlighted orangutan-type traits in the teeth and jaw remains of ancient fossil apes from Africa and Europe.
Based on their analysis, the authors suggest "that humans and orangutans share a common ancestor that excludes [living] African apes. But orangutans are native to Southeast Asia, which creates a problem: How did humans evolve in Africa if we are so closely related to the geographically distant orangutan? Explore a human migration time line. The mainstream view is that humans evolved from the same group as African great apes: chimps, bonobos, and gorillas. Instead, the authors speculate that a widely distributed orangutan-like ancestor of humans lived in Africa, Europe, and Asia some 13 million years ago.
Subsequent changes in climate and environment likely caused many populations to become extinct, leaving Asian and African species to evolve in isolation. And those molecular studies are flawed, Schwartz and Grehan say, because of the high likelihood that the data includes broadly shared DNA traits. In addition, Schwartz notes, the most cited studies are largely based on the so-called coding region of the genome, which makes up just 2 to 3 percent of an animal's DNA.
Scientists are referring to this tiny part of the genome when they say humans and chimps are so similar, he said. But other studies that focus on non-coding regions also consistently support a human-chimp link, counters Carel van Schaik of the Anthropological Institute and Museum at the University of Zurich, Switzerland.
It was soon learned from such studies that for a given protein, the number of amino acid substitutions per year could--as a first approximation--be treated as constant. This discovery became known as the "molecular clock. Using such reasoning, it has been estimated that the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees with whom we share 99 percent of our genes lived five million years ago. Going back a little farther, the Hominidae clade is 13 million years old.
If we continue farther back in time, we find that placental mammals are between 60 and 80 million years old and that the oldest four-limbed animal, or tetrapod, lived between and million years ago and the earliest chordates animals with a notochord appeared about million years ago.
Humans belong to each of these successively broader groups. How far back can we go in this way? If we try to trace all life on our planet, we are constrained by the earth's age of 4.
The oldest bacteria-like fossils are 3. The question is whether at some point before this date a last common ancestor for all forms of life, a "universal ancestor," existed.
Over the past 30 years the underlying biochemical unity of all plants, animals and microbes has become increasingly apparent. All organisms share a similar genetic machinery and certain biochemical motifs related to metabolism. It is therefore very likely that there once existed a universal ancestor and, in this sense, all things alive are related to each other.
It took more than two billion years for this earliest form of life to evolve into the first eukaryotic cell.
This gave rise to the last common ancestor of plants, fungi and animals, which lived some 1. The controversies surrounding biological evolution today reflect the fact that biologists were late in accepting evolutionary thinking.
One reason for this is that significant modifications of living things are difficult to observe during a lifetime. Darwin never saw evolution taking place in nature and had to rely on evidence from fossils, as well as plant and animal breeding.
His idea that the differences observed within a species are transformed in time into differences between species remained the most plausible theory of biodiversity in his time, but there was an awkward lack of direct observations of this process. The overall impression is of a largely arboreal species that walked bipedally whenever it ventured to the ground. Australopithecus , Homo erectus , and humans.
A male chimpanzee skull is shown as an example of modern apes. Early hominins and Australopithecus retained ape-size brains. Bipedal walking evolved very early in the hominin lineage, but Ardipithecus and possibly other early hominins retained a grasping foot that may have diminished bipedal efficiency.
Reduced canine size also evolved early in the hominin lineage, although early hominin canines were larger and more pointed than those of later hominins. Molar size increased with Australopithecus but later is reduced in Homo note: premolars are not shown in this schematic.
Arboreal locomotion, as indicated by the presence of long arms, curved fingers and toes, and other forelimb features, was common throughout much of the hominin lineage. Around 4mya we find the earliest members of the genus Australopithecus , hominins which were adept terrestrial bipeds but continued to use the trees for food and protection.
The first specimens of Australopithecus were discovered in South Africa in Dart, , and research efforts over the subsequent eight decades have produced hundreds of fossils from several species at sites all across East and Southern Africa. We now know that Australopithecus was a highly successful genus that persisted for nearly three million years Figure 1. The best-known Australopithecus species are A. The pelvis and lower limb of these species clearly indicates that they were fully bipedal: the pelvis is short and bowl-shaped, bringing the gluteal muscles around to the side of the body, as in modern humans, for trunk stabilization during bipedalism, and the first toe is in line with the other toes Ward, ; Harcourt-Smith and Aiello, The Australopithecus foot may even have had a human-like arch, based on analysis of the metatarsals and the fossilized Laetoli footprints Ward et al.
Nonetheless, compared to modern humans, the forearms were long and the fingers and toes were long and somewhat curved, suggesting that Australopithecus regularly used the trees to forage and perhaps as a refuge from predators at night. Brain size in Australopithecus ranged between and cc, similar to chimpanzees and gorillas Falk et al.
Body size in Australopithecus was rather small and sexually dimorphic, about 30kg for females and 40kg for males McHenry, This level of dimorphism is not reflected in the canines, which were small, blunt, and monomorphic as in earlier hominins. Unlike the canines, molar teeth in Australopithecus were much larger than those of earlier hominins, and had thicker enamel.
This suggests their diet included hard, low quality plant foods that required powerful chewing to process. A subgroup of Australopithecus , known as the "robust" australopiths often labeled by a separate genus Paranthropus because of their enormous teeth and chewing muscles, took this adaptation to the extreme.
Most Australopithecus species were extinct by 2 mya, but some robust forms persisted until about 1. The earliest fossils of our own genus, Homo , are found in East Africa and dated to 2.
These early specimens are similar in brain and body size to Australopithecus , but show differences in their molar teeth, suggesting a change in diet. Indeed, by at least 1. The oldest member of the genus Homo , H. Its more formidable and widespread descendant, H. Like modern humans, H.
Its global expansion suggests H. Not surprisingly, it is with H. Molar size is reduced in H. Around kya, and perhaps earlier, H. Neanderthals H. Fossil and DNA evidence suggest our own species, H. The increased behavioral sophistication of H. By kya, our species spilled into Eurasia, eventually expanding across the entire globe into Australia and the Americas DiGiorgio et al. Along the way our species displaced other hominins they encountered, including Neanderthals in Europe and similar forms in Asia.
Note that not all agree with this interpretation of the data, see Tryon and Bailey. Studies of ancient DNA extracted from Neanderthal fossils suggest our species may have occasionally interbred with them Green et al. Our increasing global impact continues today, as cultural innovations such as agriculture and urbanization shape the landscape and species around us.
Anton, S. Natural history of Homo erectus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology S37 , Blumenschine, R. Science , Brunet, M. New material of the earliest hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad. Nature , Dart, R. Australopithecus africanus : the southern ape-man of Africa. DeGiorgio, M. Out of Africa: modern human origins special feature: explaining worldwide patterns of human genetic variation using a coalescent-based serial founder model of migration outward from Africa. Falk, D. Early hominid brain evolution: a new look at old endocasts.
Journal of Human Evolution 38 , Harcourt-Smith, W. Fossils, feet and the evolution of human bipedal locomotion. Journal of Anatomy , Kimbel, W. Systematic assessment of a maxilla of Homo from Hadar, Ethiopia.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology , Kunimatsu, Y. A new Late Miocene great ape from Kenya and its implications for the origins of African great apes and humans.
McHenry, H. Body size and proportions in early hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 87 , Pickford, M. Bipedalism in Orrorin tugenensis revealed by its femora. Comptes Rendus Palevol 1 ,
0コメント